Defined benefit vs Defined contribution Doing so brief sentence, with reference to the cuts of employer information by existing legislation on well being and security at function and in specific art. two paragraph 1 letter b) of D. Decree Zero 9/4/08 81, containing the Consolidated Law on well being and security at function, Defined benefit vs Defined contribution factors out which in the workplace which the employer ought to be thought of rather than the holder of an work commitment with the worker the holder of an work partnership with the same , may fall into doing so segment of the e-cigarette review also the one who, in accordance to a principle of effectiveness, normally requires the determine of the employer in truth. Off the bona fide assumption of a afterwards an work partnership, whatever the kind, the place of the worker against the employer is intrinsic in the full and efficient physical exercise of the powers of employers. The Courtroom of Appeals rpc_30_rpc reported not to proceed against the two employers of the company, becoming the offense of manslaughter billed to them extinguished by prescription the proper required arrange as a granting of extenuating situation prevailing in the Defined benefit vs Defined contribution accept of documented relapse happened compensation mishaps in favor of the heirs of the hurt, although excluding the chance of granting the who was the owner of the company, the general prevailing subcontractor has replicated the sentence against him to the punishment of a year and 3 weeks suspended prison sentences inflicted. Judgement of the Superior Work August 7, 1998, Zero. 7792, reads The Courtroom has returned the issue of problem of the Workplace pursuant to art. 2087 of the Civil Program, stating which the employer must show which he required all sensible actions to prevent the event not only in the presence of the hazard, but also validation of a causal link in between which and the failure to make use of sure measures Safety (general or precise).